Diary 2025-01-27

Case of the missing Inquiry Submission regarding OPPOSING the Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)

On the 23 of January I made a submission to Parliament of Australia via the APH website at [[1]Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)]

The submission was as follows:

REJECT/REVOKE THE WHO IHR &TREATY AND CUT ALL TIES TO THE W.H.O. Date: 23 Jan 2025

During the Pandemic the WHO was instrumental in recommending various actions and policy that has been proved again and again to be in opposition to being the best action "for the people", productive or safe in nearly every instance.

Changes to International Health Regulations (IHR), and the introduction of the Pandemic Treaty by the WHO will not affect the sovereignty of Australia!

This is what their leader (accused War Criminal) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, wants you to believe. He goes as far to call this suggestion "misinformation" or a "conspiracy theory".

An example of the detriment of the WHO can be summed up in an analysis I conducted myself (in April 2022) from data at Our World in Data showed that: - The COVID-19 death rate in ALL low vaccinated countries (less than 15% fully vaccinated) was more than 12 times less than the WORLD COVID-19 average death rate - 61% of countries with high vaccination (70% or more fully vaccinated) saw a death rate more than 3 times higher than the WORLD COVID-19 average death rate.

Further to this, more recently, it has been found that:

- All highly vaccinated countries have been seeing higher than average EXCESS death rates since the start of the vaccine rollout to date in the order to 5 to 20% higher than the prior 5-year average. Including many in young cohorts. The number of excess deaths since the rollout of the vaccines now greatly exceeds the deaths of soldiers in WWI and WWII COMBINED, while our leaders continue to ignore this fact and refuse to conduct an INDEPENDENT inquiry into these deaths! Where is their remembrance day???

- Groups not vaccinated such as the Amish have not suffered any excess deaths from COVID-19 or any increases in cardiac arrests. The Amish people completely ignored guidelines during the pandemic. Therefore, they didn’t vaccinate, wear masks, engage in lock-downs, or partake in any other restrictions. Researchers have not been able to find a single definitive case of an Amish person dying from COVID-19 after analyzing tens of thousands of people.

- WA is a great case study due to its severe border policy. It showed an increase in myocarditis occurring after vaccination but BEFORE the virus took hold there. This shows that these injuries were not a result of infection! (Details --> https://umbrellanews.com.au/featured/2023/03/how-the-hermit-kingdom-became-the-worlds-control-group-for-the-largest-vaccination-trial-ever/)

While it might be technically correct that these changes will not grant the WHO the power to DIRECTLY control the people of Australia, it will give them the power to declare pandemics or a state of emergency whenever they like (with or without evidence or cause) including requesting that it's members adhere to the call for action as and when requested by the WHO including, curfews, lock-downs, mandates, forced vaccinations, surveillance and more.

Based on this data we simply cannot and should not take any chance for a repeat of this.

They CAN and WILL compel our leaders to do these things again or threaten them with breach of the agreed upon terms of a legally binding contract, making them liable for fines or worse.

The regulations allow the WHO to ASK its members (i.e. Countries) to perform these invasive, authoritarian acts that have a massive potential for abuse and misuse while limiting any recourse or accountability.

Therefore, technically, no sovereignty will been given away but rather our leaders will have willingly accepted the terms of a contract that supersedes making decisions independently.

They can technically say the sovereignty remains with the country as it is up to the country if they accept the demand or they could choose to ignore it but will then be in breach and may face a massive fine or worse.

The implications for breaches of human rights, attacks on personal freedom and the potential for HARM AND COUNTLESS DEATHS are very real.

Further to this I have compiled a list of 25 reasons why the amendments must not be accepted.

I oppose the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) and I DEMAND that our government reject them in their entirety pursuant to Article 61 of the IHR for the following reasons: Please note that in the current IHR (2005): “a health measure does not include law enforcement or security measures.” 1. Article 1 - The definition of “pandemic emergency” is so vague that it is meaningless. It accomplishes nothing except to offer the Director-General a means to instill needless fear on a global basis which is UNACCEPTABLE. 2. Article 1 - The definition of “relevant health products” should not contain cell-and gene- based therapies and it completely ignores natural herbs, nutritional products and alternative remedies. Mentioned in Articles 13, 16, 17 and 18 and Annex 1, it essentially guarantees profits for the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex (PHEIC) at the expense of more affordable, safer and more effective natural products. This is UNACCEPTABLE. 3. Article 1 - The failure to define the terms “pandemic,” “prevention,” “preparedness,” “response,” “safe and effective,” and “vaccine” is UNACCEPTABLE. 4. Article 4 - Using two different terms to define the manner in which states parties communicate with the World Health Organization is redundant, wasteful and, quite frankly, it is simply stupid. There is simply no need for this amendment whatsoever, therefore it is UNACCEPTABLE. 5. Article 10 - The amendment to this article continues to allow the World Health Organization to operate in secrecy during times of emergency “when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, WHO should share with other States Parties the information about the event available to it.” Secrecy is repugnant in an open and just society. This is UNACCEPTABLE. 6. Article 12 - Since the definition of “pandemic emergency” is inadequate, the authority to declare a “pandemic emergency” is meaningless. It accomplishes nothing of value except to offer the Director-General a means to trigger needless fear on a global basis. Despite this new definition, the criteria for declaring various levels of health emergencies is now only more confusing. Giving the WHO Drector-General the authority to unilaterally declare a “Pandemic Emergency (PE)” in addition to a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) with absolutely no oversight and no checks or balances on his power is UNACCEPTABLE. 7. Article 13 - All of the nice sounding words in this amendment serve to hide the fact that the World Health Organization acts as the marketing and promotion arm of the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex. (PHEIC). As stated, “the Director-General shall… share with a State Party, upon its request, the product dossier related to a specific relevant health product, as provided to WHO by the manufacturer.” The World Health Organization runs a highly profitable pre-qualification scheme. This blatantly corrupt form of crony-capitalism is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE. 8. Articles 15, 16, 17 and 18 - By instructing the Director General “provide available information on any WHO-coordinated mechanism(s) concerning access to, and allocation of, relevant health products,” the amendments to these articles simply feed into the World Health Organization’s Pre-qualification and Emergency Use Listing money-making racket. These amendments are UNACCEPTABLE. 9. Article 18 - The amendment to this article stipulates that “Recommendations issued by WHO to State Parties shall… take into account the need to… maintain international supply chains.” While this may seem to be beneficial, it must be seen in the light of the negotiations for the proposed “Pandemic Agreement” which would place the World Health Organization in control of the “Global Distribution and Logistics Network.” This veiled grab for power, control and profit is UNACCEPTABLE. 10. Article 24.1(a), Article 24.1(b) and Annex 4.1(c) - Forcing conveyance operators to apply “health measures” on board and while travellers are embarking and disembarking in violation of fundamental freedoms is UNACCEPTABLE. 11. Article 27 - The additional authority to quarantine “suspect persons who are not ill” is an abominable violation of the fundamental right to liberty as well as a direct violation of Article 3 of the IHR(2005). This totalitarian overreach is also found in Articles 1, 18, 27, 31, 32, 40 and Annexes 1, 7 and 8. The unwarranted quarantine of people absolutely and totally UNACCEPTABLE. 12. Article 35, Annex 6.4 and ANNEX 6.8 - The World Health Organization must not be empowered to “develop and update, as necessary, technical guidance, including specifications or standards related to the issuance and ascertainment of authenticity of health documents.” The mere requirement of any form of “health document” is a violation of the fundamental right to privacy and is clearly UNACCEPTABLE. 13. Article 43 - The WGIHR should have worked to increase transparency, but this amendment would institute exactly the opposite by requiring that “information shared during the consultation must be kept confidential.” Secrecy is repugnant in an open and just society. This is UNACCEPTABLE. 14. Article 44 - This amendment requires “States Parties… shall maintain or increase domestic funding, as necessary, and collaborate… to strengthen sustainable financing to support the implementation of these Regulations.” HOW MUCH IS THIS GOING TO COST? This open ended agreement to keep throwing money at the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex shows that the negotiators learned nothing over the past 5 years. This is UNACCEPTABLE. 15. Article 44(bis) - Article 21 of the World Health Organization’s Constitution has no provision for a “Coordinating Financial Mechanism” to be included in the International Health Regulations. Such a “Mechanism” is outside of the Constitutional authority of the World Health Organization and MUST not be included within the IHR. Please note the recommendation made by the International Health Regulations Review Committee on page 71 of their Final Report: “The Committee notes that, under Article 44, WHO already has a role, in collaboration with States Parties, to mobilize financial resources, and cautions against creating an explicit financing function for WHO under the Regulations.” Not only is this unconstitutional, it is also UNACCEPTABLE. https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf 16. Article 44(bis) - The failure to define the details of the “Coordinating Financial Mechanism” while empowering unelected, unaccountable and unknown future bureaucrats to control the “Mechanism,” the failure to determine how much this is going to cost, the failure to require full transparency and make public a complete audit trail as well as the failure to ensure that conflicts of interest will be prevented are all UNACCEPTABLE. 17. Article 44(bis) - How much money does our nation intend to voluntarily donate to the extremely vague “Coordinating Financial Mechanism”? We the people will have absolutely no control over who receives that money, nor will be be able to determine how it is to be spent. How will we ever know if the expenditures were of any benefit? What are the metrics and means of analysis by which anyone could ever determine whether or not the spending of our money accomplished anything other than to make the recipients more wealthy? This is UNACCEPTABLE. 18. Article 44(bis) 2(e) - The “Coordinating Financial Mechanism” is quite likely going to allow unelected brokers within the financial elite to influence and control the manner in which money is provided and utilized. This is not a method by which health will be improved. This is merely a cover story for the ongoing expansion of their wealth. This is UNACCEPTABLE. 19. Article 44(bis) 2(e) - The “Coordinating Financial Mechanism” will be empowered to “leverage voluntary monetary contributions for organizations.” This is such an obvious example of corrupt crony capitalism at its very worst that it is clearly UNACCEPTABLE. 20. Article 45 - The fact that “States Parties may process and disclose personal data” is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE. 21. Article 54(bis) The creation of a States Parties Committee for the Implementation of the IHR (2005) to “facilitate the effective implementation” of the “Coordinating Financial Mechanism” along with the creation of a sub-committee to “provide technical advice” is yet another example of useless and wasteful bureaucracy that is UNACCEPTABLE. 22. Annex 1.2(c)(i) and Annex 1.3(b) Directing member nations to develop, strengthen and maintain their core capacities for surveillance must be limited in its scope in order to protect individual rights. The ongoing and ever-increasing invasion of our privacy and fundamental freedoms is UNACCEPTABLE. 23. Annex 1.2(c) and Annex 1.3(i) - Directing member nations to develop, strengthen and maintain the core capacity to address misinformation and disinformation runs the risk of violating the fundamental right of freedom of speech. This “surveillance” must reflect back solely upon the government’s duty to provide accurate information to the public, and must not, in any way, be used to censor public discourse, which is completely, and undeniablY UNACCEPTABLE. 24. Annex 2 - There needs to be an acknowledgement that by crossing out “wild-type” poliovirus, the WHO is admitting that vaccine-derived poliovirus has become a global health problem that was self-induced. The massive iatrogenic causation of disease by the very treatments that are claimed to prevent such disease (“pandemic related health products” is at the core of why the actions of the World Health Organization in general and specifically the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations are UNACCEPTABLE. 25. Annex 6 - The possibility of “someone who is unable to sign” being given a “vaccination” without their consent and stipulating that “the guardian shall sign the certificate on their behalf” opens the possibility for enormous abuses of power and is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE. I DEMAND that the amendments to the International Health Regulations be rejected in their entirety.

Due to this I believe it is crucial for the people of the Commonwealth of Australia that these changes be rejected in their entirety immediately and all further changes be revoked and further to this action Australia should follow President Trump's lead and leave the jurisdiction of the WHO immediately in order to prevent Australia becoming a target for Globalist led tyranny. Please consider opposing these changes in their entirety, rejecting the IHR amendments and the treaty, insist that a vote be requested as changes such as this should go to THE PEOPLE. Insist that this decision be tabled for discussion and debate in parliament. Further to this I would like to see Australia consider completely leaving the WHO in order to ensure the safety of all Australians and future generations.

Your assistance and allegiance in this matter would be greatly appreciated and would help ensure a safer, healthier and happier Australia for years to come.

Thank You, David Iorlano

I received a confirmation, but NO RECORD OF THE SUBMISSION COULD BE FOUND ON THE APH website..

It seems that the submission has been IGNORED.

Below is the confirmation and my response.